This
week, we continued the advertising project.
The project (entitled “Peano Advertising Wants You”) involves three
portions: a digital “interview”, or essay, a visual ad and an audio ad. The blog for last week already describes some
of my misgivings about the project, so I won’t repeat them. Instead I’ll say that, in the end, Photoshop
is fun, and the project as a whole appears quite creative.
Besides
working on the project, we studied copyright this week. It seems copyright, like heliocentrism, is
going to be a topic that pops up in various classes this year. Certainly, though, the perspective of a Computer Science teacher on
copyright is going to be different from a Fine Arts teacher! Personally, my view on copyright is that it
should be there, but significantly weaker (or at least shorter-term); perhaps
then there would be less need for semi-copyright licenses like Creative
Commons. At the very least, it needs to
be fair- say, copyright can’t go to anyone but the creator.
We also
looked at audio quality. I have to say,
a 250 Hz sampling rate sounds much better than I expected. It sounds nothing like the original music,
but that can be for the best. Anyhow,
there’s certainly quality lost when you compress music, but there’s a definite
boundary between “bad quality” and “indecipherable quality”.
No comments:
Post a Comment